The following is an excerpt from an article that appeared on
ABCNews.com February 26, 2001, reporting the results
of a yet another study on the mal-effects of smoking:
Smoking Costs Military Over $130 Million a Year
LONDON (Reuters) - Smoking is costing the U.S. military more than $130 million a year in lost training because
of the high early discharge rate among smokers, American researchers said on Tuesday.
A study of 29,000 Air Force trainees by scientists at the University of Memphis in Tennessee showed that the
dropout rate among smokers was nearly double that of non-smokers and cost the Air Force $18 million a year in
excess training costs.
When they estimated the costs across all the U.S. military services it came to $130 million a year.
"Smoking is related to early discharge from the US military and may cost the Department of Defense
over $130 million per year or close to one percent of the total annual training costs," said Dr. Robert Klesges of
the Center for Community Health at the university.
…They found that smoking was the best indicator of early discharge over one year of training among new
recruits. It was also an indication of other behaviors.
Smokers tended to be from lower income families. The habit was also associated with dieting, drug and alcohol
abuse and lack of physical activity.
"Probably the most sensible recommendation would be for the military to step up its efforts to encourage
non-smokers to join the armed forces as well as to support smoking cessation efforts among those who smoke,"
Klesges added…"
Does smoking also cause low income, dieting, drug and alcohol abuse, and a lack of physical activity, which
are some of the other behaviors also associated with smoking in the article? Few these days would argue the
fact that smoking is associated with a wide variety of health problems, but to observe that smoking is
highly correlated with drop out rates in the military and conclude that "smoking costs military over $130
million a year" makes the very fundamental mistake of assuming that correlation implies causation. This
simple but often misunderstood concept is tempting to ignore, especially for those hungry for a story,
or eager to sell something, or searching for funding, or so many other things.
|