Today, the vast majority of financial institutions use credit scoring models. They provide a quick,
inexpensive, and relatively objective means of credit risk evaluation. The concept of credit scoring
was first introduced in the 1950s. Since then, it has been most widely used to evaluate consumer loans
such as auto loans and credit cards. In recent years, however, with the advent of increased computing
power, new methodologies, and increased data availability, scoring models are now being used in
business lending as well. In response, to ensure fair lending practices, the federal government has
issued guidelines on the use of scoring models in lending decisions. The following is excerpted from a
description of those guidelines that appeared in the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business
Review article, "What’s the Point of Credit Scoring?"
The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (implemented by the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation
B) prohibits creditors from discriminating in any aspect of a credit transaction because of an
applicant’s race, color, religion, national origin, gender, marital status, or age (provided the
applicant has the capacity to contract), because all or part of an applicant’s income derives from
public assistance, or because the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Consumer
Credit Protection Act.
Scoring models cannot include information on race, gender, or marital status. Recently, the Board
amended its commentary on Reg. B to clarify the use of age in credit scoring models. Reg. B
defines an "empirically derived, demonstrably and statistically sound, credit scoring system" as one
that is: (i) based on data that are derived from an empirical comparison of sample groups or the
population of creditworthy and noncreditworthy applicants who applied for credit within a reasonable
preceding period of time; (ii) developed for the purpose of evaluating the creditworthiness of
applicants with respect to the legitimate business interest of the creditor; (iii) developed and
validated using accepted statistical principles and methodology; and (iv) periodically reevaluated
by the use of appropriate statistical principles and methodology and adjusted as necessary to
maintain predictive ability. Reg. B classifies any other system as a judgmental system, and such
systems cannot use age directly as a predictive variable in the model.
However, if the model does qualify as an empirically derived, demonstrably and statistically
sound system, the Board has determined that it can use age directly in the model as long as the
weight assigned to an applicant 62 years or older is not lower than that assigned to any other age
category. And if a system assigns points to some other variable based on the applicant’s age,
applicants who are 62 years and older must receive at least the same number of points as the most
favored class of nonelderly applicants. (Any system of evaluating creditworthiness may favor a credit
applicant aged 62 years or older, given the other factors contained in the model). Also, a well-built
model will include all allowable factors that produce the most accurate prediction of credit
performance, so a lender using such a model might be able to argue that a similarly effective
alternative was not available. But banks that override the model for certain borrowers need to be
particularly careful in documenting the reasons for the override to avoid violating fair lending laws.
Similarly, borrowers right at the margin of cutoff for approval must be handled carefully.
|